SoloFlow AI · Last updated May 13, 2026

Fact-Check Policy

SoloFlow AI fact-checks claims that could affect a freelancer's buying decision, client promise, compliance posture, pricing, or expectations about AI tools.

What must be fact-checked

• Exact AI tool pricing, plan names, model access, limits, or feature availability.
• Comparison claims between AI tools.
• Platform-specific claims about Upwork, Fiverr, cold email, outreach rules, or marketplace expectations.
• Claims that could affect pricing, client delivery, compliance, or buying decisions.
• Any claim that sounds like a promised outcome for traffic, rankings, income, clients, replies, or conversion.

Source hierarchy

1. Official product pricing, documentation, changelog, help center, or policy page.
2. Official company announcement or release note.
3. First-party platform policy page.
4. Reputable third-party reporting only when first-party confirmation is unavailable and the claim is not critical.

Publishing guardrails

• If exact pricing was not checked the same day, pricing should be phrased as a verification checkpoint.
• Review and comparison pages should favor workflow testing notes over broad best-tool claims.
• Benchmark claims should not be published unless the source is current, credible, and relevant to freelancers.
• AI-assisted client-facing examples should be reviewed for accuracy, specificity, privacy, and unsupported proof.

Review cadence

Pricing and AI tool reviews should be reviewed every 30 days or before major promotion. Comparisons should be reviewed every 30 days. Platform policy guidance should be reviewed every 30-60 days. General guides should be reviewed every 60-90 days. Resource templates should be reviewed every 90 days unless reader feedback reveals an issue.

Corrections

If a claim is outdated or unclear, readers can request a correction through the corrections process. High-risk factual claims should also be tracked in the internal fact-check log before heavy promotion.